Centre for Learning Technology internal blog
http://econwiki.lse.ac.uk/clt/blog/
richard eskins | MMU teaching and learning fellowship diary 2005/2007
As you may know Information and Communications has been selected as one of the ten Phase 1 projects for WebCT Vista at MMU. Each Faculty has at least one Phase 1 project, HLSS has 3: Information & Communications, Sociology and Law. Phase 2 will be to stop using WebCT Campus Edition for a complete move to
In attempt to outline the project, highlight the issues and provide some form of rationale I offer the following questions and answers.
You will have your own questions. Please post comments below or email me directly.
With the success of Courseware why should we as a Department be looking to move from Courseware to another environment?
The University has caught up! MMU has finally shown a major commitment to the use of a virtual learning environment. Support has developed from the original group who led the way to a fully fledged Learning and Teaching team. Information and Communications have been in the enviable position of having a mature system that allowed us to deliver teaching materials in support of a ‘blended’ learning environment praised by students, QAA and externals. However, we are now in danger of going from being ahead to being behind. If we don’t take the opportunity to move into the WebCT environment now we will soon be lagging behind rather than being a leader.
If we do make the move to WebCT we have the advantage of holding materials in a structured, electronic format within the Courseware environment. Once moved to WebCT we can then start to see what advantages the ‘extra’ tools available can bring to us as teachers and to the Department as a whole.
Technical issues.
Courseware has always run on the Department’s own web server. This is managed and maintained by myself with very little support from the local Information Systems team. This is a very ‘unsafe’ environment with no backup. It is also a limited environment with a single login for staff and a single login for student. There is limited security and no accountability. Unless we undertake further development Courseware will remain limited in its functionality and provide little beyond document delivery. This has of course been part of its charm and success.
WebCT Vista is hosted on centrally supported servers with all the relevant backups, security and support. Access is through network ID’s making all users accountable (particularly useful in light of the possible new copyright rules regarding electronic documents). There will however be ‘risks’ as this is a new system and we will be ‘early adopters’.
Is this a wholesale move?
Initially I thought yes, get a template sorted and move over everything. However with the existing time restrictions it may be more prudent to start with all Level 1 units.
Moving every unit from Courseware to WebCT.
This may be fairly simple; it could possibly be automated to some degree. It could also be very time consuming.
Moving only Level 1 units to WebCT
This may be a more practical solution, giving some room for feedback etc. prior to full commitment.
Conversion of existing WebCT units to
This will need to be done for both options.
Usability for staff – do I become a WebCT developer
No. The intention is to provide a templated approach which makes the member of staff an editor rather than developer. You should be able to add, update and remove content as required.
But won’t that make WebCT into just a document delivery system like Courseware?
To start with, yes. This way the learning curve shrinks and you can concentrate on providing at least a Courseware type level of service. You should understand that it may be more complicated than Courseware but I will only implement the change if it is still ‘simple enough’.
So what about those WebCT extras?
Once you are up and running we can then look at what tools are available and how they can help your units. Examples are tools to support group projects, online quizzes and more practical elements such as student tracking to see who is using your materials.
So I then become a developer?
Well yes and no. We want to maintain some control by using templates as this ensures a student will have some level of consistency between units. If every unit (as they are now in WebCT) has a different look and feel usability fades fast along with any ‘Departmental’ identity. The focus will remain on supporting your teaching, not in becoming a web designer.
So how do I add the bells and whistles if I’m not a developer?
The way I understand Vista works is that we can't restrict you as in Courseware. However I envisage that a key aspect of the new Information Officers role will be to support online learning within the Department. The Information Officer will work with you to add these ‘tools’ to your units. He will become our WebCT expert. We will also have the support of the team in the Learning and Teaching Unit.
So what will a basic unit consist of?
At present I see each unit containing space for supporting materials as per Courseware and submission boxes for each element of coursework for that particular unit. There may be other elements that I have yet to discover that it will makes sense to provide as part of the basic package.
And if I have an existing WebCT CE unit?
We will convert this into the
Advantages of phased move to
Disadvantages
So what are you doing Richard?
Well in a very short time I need to come up with a template. Hopefully this can be done in conjunction with other Departments and Faculties as many are working on similar projects. I then need to find out if all of the above elements are practical within the
So what do I need to do?
Not a lot at the moment.
Don’t rush into updating Courseware for next term yet.
Let me know what you think, either below or by email.
If you have an existing WebCT unit, let me know if you are going to continue to use it.
Watch out for the first seminar for the Department on WebCT Vista
Summary